Oi you two I feel it is my duty to tell you that Gill has resumed her black belt Ju-Jitsu training. Back on topic - it was also my understanding that the Simpson hybrid is more tolerant of belt position. However, their literature says otherwise and, joking apart, my lack of height does mean that the belts may not have had the correct angle to effectively hold the FHR in place. If the belt slopes upwards from the shoulders then it is fairly obvious that the device could move in an impact. If this is not an issue for you then you will probably be fine. As above, the standard Caterham belt positions aren't even equidistant from the seat centre-line - I was happier having mine moved but for someone with broader shoulders, it's probably not so critical. If you look at the install instructions for 6 point harnesses (ignoring FHRs), they should be in the same position as required for an FHR - if the belts hold you in place properly then they will hold the FHR in place. With the traditional HANS design the concern is that the belts could slip off the restraint in an impact hence the requirement to ensure the top belt mounts are close enough together to prevent this - the design of the Simpson Hybrid appears to be likely less sensitive to this. Ultimately it comes down to your approach to safety. I am naturally conservative in this respect hence my decision to have the mounts altered. Since I had to have the crotch strap mounts added as well, it made sense to me to have all the modifications done at the same time. Arch had already done a couple of modifications for other Simpson Hybrid users. I still prefer the Simpson Hybrid to a HANS design for other reasons (comfort, ease of use, quick release tethers) and am happy with my choice.