Of course it could have been poor quality, or dirty fuel, but I never went back to standard unleaded again. What does the factory say for your engine? Once we know how could we persuade you to rerun that experiment, but with 95 RON fuel from a high turnover supply in the UK? £5 wager that it doesn't run as badly as it did that time, takings to NtL? Jonathan PS: Following that interesting discussion about Ricardo, here's a photo (I don't have a schematic diagram) of the E-35 variable compression test engine that helped him unlock the problem of fuel quality, and his own thoughts: http://www-g.eng.cam.ac.uk/millennium/achievements/ricardo/images/th-R34.jpg During the 1914-18 War, I came into contact with Sir Robert Waley-Cohen, of the Shell Company, who, at that time, was chairman of a committee dealing with fuel supplies. To him I told of my experiments on detonation, of the very great importance I attached to it, and of my belief that it was largely a function of the fuel. He immediately sent me samples of a wide range of fuels of different origin, which I tried out on my supercharging engine, and I was able to show him very great differences in their behaviour as regards detonation. Of these sample fuels, by far the best was one hailing from Borneo. He told me to my amazement, that hundreds of thousands of tons of this particular petrol were being burnt to waste in the Borneo jungle merely because it did not comply with the existing specification as to specific gravity. On the strength of these observations, he invited me to undertake, as soon as the war was over, a comprehensive research into the behaviour of liquid fuels. This, then, formed the first piece of large-scale research undertaken at our new laboratory at Shoreham."