I've already expressed my preference. I was about to suggest that it might help to understand others' opinions if we worked though the most common use cases and tabulated the usability of the two main alternatives: number of clicks, signal to noise in what's returned, how much you have to think and remember to get what you need... But then Finmac posted: This time round, with the combined sections I have had a much better response - my simple conclusion is - it works much better this way! And that reminded me that we know that different users use different views, home pages, navigation methods and search tools to try and find and refind what interests them. (In my opinions this is largely because of problems with the site other than this specific issue. I've already posted details of these.) Are those differences in user behaviour affecting responses to this specific issue? Or why Finmac has reported a better response? Jonathan PS: Thanks to Shaun and others for all their work in supporting the Club.