I figure a couple of big lumps of aluminium (preheated and with a few thermocouples mounted), a small coolant circuit (also with measured temp) and pump will quickly show how good a coolant it is. I have a very strong suspicion about what it will show (even their claims are mostly obvious nonsense) but it's always nice to test for definitive proof of course. I think it would be nice to hear any comments about shortfalls/oversights beforehand. I don't think the type of radiator is too critical however, so long as it is the same for all coolant tested It would be great to see some experiments. We know that the thermal capacity of Evans Waterless Coolant is less than that of conventional coolant. So I'd encourage you to concentrate on experiments that don't spend too much time on that, although you'll probably show it along the way. The more you can make your rig like a real Seven's engine the better. That could include using the same materials as in the block and radiator and getting the flow rates as similar as possible. The logical end point of that is doing the experiments on a real engine. The downside of that of course is the cost of the proprietary product. How much is a couple of engines' worth? I might put in my share... ... especially if we can turn the outcome into a wager with the winnings going to the Club charity. But I'd warn everyone joining in that we also already know that engines run hotter on Evans Waterless Coolant than on conventional coolant. Jonathan