Jump to content
Click here if you are having website access problems ×

Chris G

Account Inactive
  • Posts

    46
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. Latest update: The call for payments has now gone out. If you wanted to get in on the bulk buy and haven't received an email from me please let me know ASAP. If you've been thinking about a shiftlight but haven't so far made up your mind then you still have until the 23rd July to make your mind up and get payment to me, email me privately for details of how to do that (pay that is, I can't help you make up your mind :-) ). Chris
  2. Just by way of an update we've now got 15 orders for shiftlights and I note that Fluke are going to start selling the shift-i unit for 99.99+vat, details on their website here To recap, the bulk buy price is 72 pounds all in and at this point I just need an email to chris@g2.nu saying whether you want the straight or curved style ASAP if you want to get in on the deal. This is the last bulk buy of the shiftlights that I'm organising so after this one closes you will be best off going to fluke to get hold of them. Edited by - Chris G on 14 Jul 2006 11:38:10
  3. A couple of people at the Cambridge Treasure hunt this evening were pondering using the curved style unit and I promised that I'd put up a link to some templates so you can try them for size. As promised you can find the PDF file here www.g2.nu/chris/misc/shiflights/cutouts.pdf
  4. Oh, I had a bunch of responses to peoples queries from the manufacturer which might be of interest. All reproduced with permission from Ecliptech. =========================================== You don't need to match the revs against the tacho accurately. Some people run without a tacho and just use a Shift-I. Matching to the tacho makes sure that when you set your rpm points, the Shift-I knows what your trying to program. Chris W hit the nail on the head with this one. To be honest, you'll find most needle tachos to be rather inaccurate (particularly at the top end), and often lag the actual engine RPM on rapid acceleration. The accuracy of the actual RPM number is not particularly important. The most important thing is to have something that is consistently accurate. Mwoodham has a good point too. The tacho signal from the ECU is not always representative of the ignition pulse at a plug. It can be a multiple. Either way, wasted spark or not, it's supported. You can change the settings to 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 pulses per engine revolution. Setting 2 is most common (default), and sometimes 1 and 4. Chris W is right, in that most of these tachos operate by an average reading. It can be averaged to produce an analog voltage, pulse counted over a fixed period or also timed pulse of fixed count. These methods are relatively slow to react to changes, and therefore not as accurate. This is particularly true at lower RPMs. The Shift-I uses a sophisticated algorithm to read the RPM, together with an analog filter. The software measure "every single pulse", accurately measuring the time between both low to high and high to low transitions. It is pulse measuring, not pulse counting or pulse averaging. It will detect a noise spike, reject it and still measure the pulse as if the noise wasn't there! After the pulse passes the noise filter, it then goes into a small buffer which ranks and picks those most consistent. The result is a system that is very fast to respond to engines RPM, as it is measuring ignition events, not averaging to mask erroneous data. It was specifically designed to respond fast, but not from a noisy signal. I'm quite proud of it The noise rejection filter is user controlled. I don't like fully automatic systems, as it could be unpredictable and/or unreliable between various cars/bikes. So there are 7 sensitivity settings you can pick from. Most people leave it on the default, 6. But if you run direct from the low side of the coil, the optimum is usually 3 or 4. If you get flickering, then just reduce the sensitivity. Display should be rock stable. Visibility was the key to this design. It was designed with 7 lights, because it is the maximum you can comfortably recognize in your peripheral vision. You don't have to look at the display to tell how many lights are on. There are better things for your eyes to be looking at ;-) The automatic dimming function is probably more sophisticated than most would realize. You can change the brightness at any time and it will remember. In fact, it remembers what you set it to for the given ambient light, and adjusts it's internal map. For example, changing the brightness at night will not effect the brightness you set during the day. As far as your concerned, you might adjust it once or twice and then completely forget about the feature. You can change the RPM range it shows to anything you want, down to a resolution of 50 RPM. For example, lights start at 2,650 and flash at 6,150. Being digital set, you can make fine adjustments. Water proof, no. Water resistant, yes. I=92ve only ever had one = customer that had one filled with water, due to it being on its side with the bottom air vents exposed to a heavy downpour. 5 minutes with a hair dryer fixed that. They are very robust! They are also coated with a lacquer for protection against the elements. They should be mounted behind a windscreen to prevent rain being forced in at speed. BTW not that I recommend trying, but I have pictures of one running in a fishtank! The sensitivity setting is specifically to reject noise on the signal. If too much noise gets through the digital filter (flickering), then reduce it. This however is different to hunting around a point, where a light may flicker as you hover around a particular RPM. This is specifically addressed with the RPM Hysteresis. You'll need to venture into the Advanced Settings Manual to see the details. By now your probably thinking of that second cup of coffee before continuing to read hehe. This hysteresis setting means that once a light turns on, the engine RPM has to drop a certain amount before the light turns off. A shift indicator that flickers isn't something you can rely on, hence it was a feature designed in at the concept stage. In reality, its probably a feature you won't even notice unless you look for it. If interested, you can turn it off, or tweak how far the revs need to drop before each light will turn off. As for cost, please don't think its an 'economical model' because its cheap compared to others. I'm an electronics engineer, bit of a nutter when it comes to the technical specifics and love motorsports (from the drivers seat). I have low overheads and no intermediate distributor and then shop to add to the price tag. Oh... and it was initially targeted at bikes, but was definitely designed for both bikes and cars. I'm just not that good when it comes to marketing hehe... I'II get around to making a separate gallery and updating the manuals when I have enough pictures to make a separate car gallery (hint hint hehe...).
  5. Just to clear up any confusion I organised the last bulk buy that Myles was part of. The prices I am quoting for this bulk buy are based on the costs incurred in that last bulk buy and fully account for shipping from australia, onward shipping to everyone over here and all customs,duty and vat charges. In the bulk buy there are two options, the "straight" style which is what most people seem to have gone for to date and the "curved" style which is designed to fit around a standard speedo/rev counter. Cost, all inclusive is 72 pounds. If you would like to part of the bulk buy then all you have to do at this stage is let me know "straight" or "curved" in an email to chris@g2.nu by the weekend. In terms of post sales support, should you need it you would deal with the manufacturer. Tony at EclipTech is so responsive and helpful that you really don't want anyone else sticking their oar in. Chris
  6. There are many sorts of visual flaws and most of them are non-structural. Given that all the parts we're talking about here are non-structural anyway I can't see why you'd care anyway.
  7. AVES: "EFA - don't get into these rucks let the products speak for themselves" That's precisely the problem, he doesn't seem to want to do that. It seems to me that he's all mouth and no trousers.
  8. SO arnie askes for: "I'll happily participate in an LF evaluation, provided such evaluation is chaired by an automotive racing composites expert." Which is what has been offered and now he says that a technical evaluation is no good and he wants a consumer one. Well EFA, looks like you've stitched yourself up good and proper this time. Understanding a little about the technical issues for the levels at which anyone here would have a use then the MOG parts sound the ideal compromise. If you're need full on pre-preg parts then you better have invested an awful lot of time on the computer running the analysis on it or you will be wasting your time. So arnie, which package were you using for your analysis and composition optimisation, care to share the results? No thought not.
  9. Chris G

    7x15 wheels

    7x15 wheels wanted, not too fussy about what sort if the price is right. Offset needs to be something of the order ET22-ET25
  10. 1psi in clean airflow, it's possible that the high pressure created by the nose ups that even more. OTOH if the headlight is sat in front of it bang go all the gains. In my case 1psi was worth 18bhp and my inlet is *behind* the rad so there's an awful lot of gain to be had but I couldn't bear everyone pointing and laughing at it. As bill says puting a scoop at the base of the screen should be the best of all.
  11. In terms of archieving 300BHP 700 quid isn't a great deal really. Rover V8/VX/Duratec/whatever would be a way over 10k to get to these sorts of power levels. Even with that extra 700 quid, you're still only looking at 3500 or so and you'll have over 350BHP. At 10 quid/BHP that's still cheap power.
  12. Turbocharging is cheap and you get lots of power but it's a very different se7en experience. 2-3k gets you 300BHP. A decent V engine will get you 300BHP for similar money but with a nicer power delivery.
  13. batteredoldsupersport, the upgrade was replace the 19row chargecooler pre-rad with a 43 row one. I got a good deal on the rad (a tenner) connectors, a bit of paint, 2 nuts,bolts ,washers a bit of welding wire/gas for the bracket and a bit of time was all it took. Picture here: http://www.g2.nu/chris/westie/pictures/20031012/med/img_2104.jpg Further improvements will come from getting cold air to the aif filter which could be accomplished with some ducting made out of old cardboard. Assuming you have carboard to hand that's a free upgrade and an infinite amount of BHP per pounds
  14. Dino, I have a suspicion that removing the screen from my car and the lard heavy interior it would be damn close to the ring record. If you've seen the video of my car at the ring that's recording a pretty good time, despite being about 30BHP down,having a 20st passenger and a driver that wasn't completely familiar with the circuit.
  15. Blimey Bill, 10quid/BHP you've got deep pockets. My last upgrade cost about 80 pence/BHP
×
×
  • Create New...