First of all I think the decision to commission a comprehensive study was the right one, realising that as with these things the result will never please everyone. But remember that the study looked at whether any other ROPS, using one of four roll bars alone, were better under strict analysis than the stated minimum of the 1996 era 'FIA' bar Whether that minimum is the right one is moot as the Club could in no way going forward agree to a 'lower' standard due to potential liability issues I think we should be proud that 'our' club has decided this approach and should accept the results As with most things in life there are rules and sometimes you may not agree with them but if you want to play you play by the rules I do have a couple of questions though 1. The report was reviewed by a few 'engineering experts' - how were they chosen and does the club have a record of capability within its ranks (interest here as a Fellow of the IMechE with 30+ years automotive experience) Not that I wanted to be involved per se but it would be interesting to know our collective capability (BUT I don't want to divert the theme of this thread!) 2. in reference to the cost being a limiting factor for those that do track days - I find that a bit strange. We all have budget limits and constraints but I would guess none of us have a 7 as a daily driver so it is a 'toy'- 'FIA' bars are not cheap but can be found used for about £125 (I know this for sure, although you do then have to think about boot cover, hood etc). I don't know how much a track day actually costs but I am guessing with fuel, tyres and entry and the costs of getting kitted out with suit and helment the decision to attend one is not solely down to the cost of a bar.