Jump to content
Click here to contact our helpful office staff ×

HELP! 1993 1400Kss Still having problems with emissions! PASSED


Brucey

Recommended Posts

Further to my previous thread, my 7 is still in the garage trying to pass it's emissions for the MOT *mad*.

Basically it's failing CO level on Natural Idle Test. 3.9% at 1018 rpm (0.50 max allowed)

 

The guy has checked Lambada output (o.k), cam timing (near enough!), compression & leakdown tests (ok), air leaks around inlet manifold (none found).

 

He stuck a vacuum generator on the pipe going to the ecu and managed to reduce the CO, but the car wouldn't run!

 

I've known the guy doing the work for a number of years (into classic bikes) and he is VERY good at diagnosing faults but this is beginning to stump him!

 

I've given him Caterham's & Minster's phone numbers, but has anyone else had a similar problem?

 

Checking the emissions done last year (previous owner) it passed but engine speed is noted as 'not checked' *confused*

 

Bruce.

 

Edited by - brucey on 12 Apr 2006 23:57:00

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your suggestions Cagey & Dicky.

 

It just bugs me why the problem is so obscure. Surely a bog standard super sport should have no problems on emissions? To imply changing the ECU to a mappable one would help must mean something has changed on the existing ECU input/output.

 

If the cat had gone I would have thought it would fail on both 'Normal Idle' & 'Fast Idle'.

 

The guy trying to sort it keeps a record of all the cars that have failed, what engine and what was done to resolve it. His selection of about 8 Rovers that failed on CO usually points to Lambada Sensor or leaking/distorted throttle body (plastic type). My car has an alloy throttle body with no obvious air leaks and the Lambada sensor checks out o.k on his tester.

 

Even though the Injector timing was checked, he did wonder if it was getting 2 squirts instead of 1 thus making it run rich at tick over. Is this possible?

 

I guess chucking injector cleaner in and giving it a good blat won't help!

 

I suppose I'll have to cut my losses and try and find 'another' garage. As the MOT has now run out, I'll have to plan my blats around MOT tests but it could get expensive!

 

Unfortunately things like this 'niggle' me (and I know the mechanic is the same) until the answer is identified.

 

Bruce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nick & Martin, thanks for your comments.

 

My car seems to be one of the few cars that were factory built in 1993. The 6th digit of the VIN is 'F' and it is fitted with the original cat (internal) exhaust system.

 

All this means that the VOSA site chucks out 'standard cat test' when the details are put in. I suppose the garage could try selecting 'another' model as this part of the MOT process for a Caterham is very vaugue.

 

I really just wanted to know if the garage has tried everything or has anyone else managed to resolve a similar problem (without replacing the ECU).

 

Bruce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

surely a visible test only as pre 97?

 

Only if you're as good at reading the instructions as the tester that Myles uses. It is all quite clear. Factory cars are no different from any other car you might have bought. Post-August '92 and fitted with original equipment catalysts, as verified by the chassis number, then they should be put through a Cat test.

 

I reckon the hint in your symptoms is that the Lambda is spot on, but the CO is as high as it would be without a catalyst fitted - in fact it is a fail on the non-catalyst test, with CO required to be less than 3.5%.

 

Either your cat is not working (contaminated/broken up) or it is not up to temperature. Note that the test criteria require a minimum oil temperature at test time of 75degC. This is where a good thrash of everything is required. Failing that you might have to borrow/acquire another exhaust can to prove that the cat in your exhaust is at fault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peter, thanks for your comments.

 

Unfortunately trying another cat may be a little difficult as my car is fitted with a 'unique' (read PITA) internal sytem. The fact that it passed with a CO of 0.05% at 2841 rpm makes me think the cat was o.k.

 

The garage seem to think the symptoms are consistant with running too rich at slow idle.

 

Bruce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peter,

 

Thanks again for the input. *thumbup* The guy trying to sort it spoke to Caterham Cars today and they suggested chucking a load of injector cleaner etc in it and taking it for a good thrash! I wonder how many volenteers they will have for that then!

 

 

Cagey & Alan,

 

Car does have a stepper motor. I think it has already been tried disconnected as the mechanic had the air cleaner off to make sure the butterfly was closing correctly.

 

If I get it through, I think I'll change to a second hand cat side exhaust in the near future. At least it would be easier to eliminate as a potential problem next time (unfortunately the living room carpet took priority over the powerspeed bulk buy ☹️)

 

Bruce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To anyone out there who is still interested (can't be many left now!)

 

Garage is putting fuel injector cleaner in today and flushing oil (incase problem is 'sticky' tappets). Will then give it a good run and re test idle emissions.

 

I'm a little concerned about mixing the flushing oil with my year old foam sump baffle and will probably have to replace the semi synthetic oil and filter again sooner rather than later.

 

I spoke to CC regarding this, but they couldn't advise on the effect of flushing oil on their baffle.

 

George in the CC tech dept did however say recheck Lambada sensor & water temp sensor. Unfortunately the vacuum sensor is part of the ECU and needs special kit to check.

 

Get the feeling it's time to take the car back and 'have a good think' as to what I should do next. Maybe I can get an MOT on the condition I don't start the engine!

 

Bruce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Went for my (now regular) trip to the garage who are doing the MOT work on my Caterham and the guy handed me a nice new MOT certificate *thumbup* I haven't got the bill yet though ☹️.

 

Any way, they flushed & changed the oil (probably unnecessary) and chucked about a pint of injector cleaner in the tank. After a blat down the road, it went straight in for an emissions retest and passed.

 

The downside is I will have spent a lot of money (charging 4 hour labour + parts) for somthing I could have easily done myself.

 

The upside is that I know a lot more about the condidtion of my engine (cam timing, compression & leak tests, sensors etc) and I can drive it again

 

Many thanks to everyone who contributed for your input, advice and general encouragement. I think Peter probably got nearest to the solution and I know what I'll be doing before taking it for another MOT next year 😬

 

Now where did I put those verniers?

 

Bruce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...