Jump to content
Click here if you are having website access problems ×

MAP and forced induction


charlie_pank

Recommended Posts

My friend has a supercharged system in his car and is trying to sort out the fuelling. The system he has works off MAP rather than throttle pos, as I've been sorting out the fuelling on Kermit recently (in case you hadn't noticed), he asked me about his set up. Thing is I don't know how "load" is related to MAP in a forced induction system - can anyone shed light on this?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mmm - I'm making this up as I go along, but...

 

...the boost provided by the supercharger is (presumably) going to rise with revs - and so (presumably) will MAP. But load can vary with revs (nat-asp: light throttles to maintain certain revs on the flat, more throttle required to maintain the same revs on a hill...)...

 

Oh dear. 😳I'm not qualified to comment really. You want someone like DW/Oily/Bill S, I'd guess.

 

Project Scope-Creep is underway...

 

Alcester Racing 7's Equipe - 🙆🏻

 

Alcester-Racing-Sevens.com


Link to comment
Share on other sites

MAP is an abbreviation for Manifold Absolute Pressure, and as a first approximation fueling is therefore going to be proportional to MAP. This simple relationship is why many people prefer MAP over TPS, which invariably has a non-linear relationship. The problem you may experience in a supercharged application is that not all MAP sensors will accept pressures above 1 atmosphere, and you may need to source a MAP sensor which is linear up to your maximum boost pressure.

 

SEP field working, not spotted in 103,300 miles. Some photos on webshots, updated 25 Jan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In fact, for a non-hairy engine MAP is directly linear to load. PV=nRT is the ideal gas law. For an engine you need to add the volumetric efficiency to that. So at 1bar (atmospheric) to 2 bar, MAP doubles, so fuel doubles (the ECU should automagically sort out density changes due to IAT).

 

Very easy if you look at it the right way. Oddly people who understand TPS systems have real trouble with speed density and vice versa.

 

which ECU is it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bill it's a Wintec2 - he showed me the software on his work PC - it made me so happy to have an Emerald. To the untrained eye, the Wintec looked feindishly complicated. It seems to be driven off a target AFR rather than one being able to directly determine fuelling at each load/speed site. Therefore I struggle to see how it can operate effectively without a wideband 02 sensor (perhaps that's what they mean in the documentation by an "HEGO"?).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually the TEC is a fine ECU, very popular all over the world. It has a LOT of features which is why it is confusing. For example the alpha-n/speed density blend feature is really nice.

 

They were one of the first to put in autotuning. A wideband (a HEGO is not a wideband BTW) would speed things up enough. Suspect 20 mins with the manual and i could work it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...