r c ole Posted December 6, 2003 Share Posted December 6, 2003 Mile End? 195BHP Dry Sumped K Edited by - Igor on 6 Dec 2003 14:06:53 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.Mupferit Posted December 6, 2003 Share Posted December 6, 2003 Aha time to go defensive methinks.........................Raynes Park ❗ And Rowly, I don't believe, after the recently announced Aberystwyth Convention ruling, you are allowed to hand Steve a token. It quite clearly states, after the objection raised by Staniforth, "No player may extend a token to another whilst they reside in Bermondsey until (note the UNTIL) he or she has played a double inversion" Sorry Steve, you will just have to sit out your next turn. Brent Zetec Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowly Posted December 6, 2003 Share Posted December 6, 2003 Brent, I see you are up to date. There is still a good deal of controversy over Aberystwyth, particularly the wool incident, but I conceed your point. Sorry Steve I have to withdraw my token. I will go Jubilee to KINGSBURY and claim the two points off of Bethlehem. Da-naa Owner of *thumbup*The Wombat membership number 10765 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.Mupferit Posted December 6, 2003 Share Posted December 6, 2003 Hmmm a worthy and wiley opponent. So I think I will try an unconventional move here.....................Barking ❗ ❗ He he, see what you make of that my friend. Brent Zetec Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.Cameron Posted December 6, 2003 Share Posted December 6, 2003 Dear Sir, I'm writing to complain at the recent out break of aggresive play I have noted on your normaly friendly site. The excessive quoting of rule books that only the most distant factions of civilisation (and remember I live in North Wales when commenting on distant factions of civilisation...) would accept as homolgated game definitions has created an atmosphere of quite torid ill feeling and mis-content. I long for the return of the finner days of sporting play. yours, Frustrated North Wales Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowly Posted December 6, 2003 Share Posted December 6, 2003 Mrs Trellis, your letter seems to have been mis-routed by the Royal mail. I have forwarded it here. Back to the game... Brent I have not seen such an elegant redouble such as that since the '99 MC final in Chalfont. You have ousted me to Osterley. I see I am going to have to raise my game. Owner of *thumbup*The Wombat membership number 10765 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buda Posted December 6, 2003 Share Posted December 6, 2003 this is obviously becoming heated, may I suggest that you have all become 'sidetraked' pardon the expression, so I shall move ACTON GATE, and claim a rushden with the same move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve-B Posted December 6, 2003 Share Posted December 6, 2003 i must put myself forward as STEVENAGE who drinks OBAN whilst dancing the FESTIONOGG twist 😬 Steve B Big Black Beast^3 SV VHPD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
La vache espagnole Posted December 7, 2003 Share Posted December 7, 2003 Tempted though I am to play Leningrad after what looks decidedly like foul play from Mr B, I will instead make a move that is superficially orthodox and yet I believe a tactical master stroke: Plaistow He he, beat that... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buda Posted December 7, 2003 Share Posted December 7, 2003 ahhh so, using the 1982 cartmell incident proviso, I shall move CUTTY SARK to throw you further from your goal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve-B Posted December 8, 2003 Share Posted December 8, 2003 but to the Wimpy other contestants, i shall only say : our time is set from GREENWICH 😳 😳 for our travels Steve B Big Black Beast^3 SV VHPD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisb Posted December 8, 2003 Share Posted December 8, 2003 Am I right in thinking Canada Water would be the right move here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boonie Hound Posted December 8, 2003 Share Posted December 8, 2003 I have been biding my time for just this move - I'll think you find that even using Nietsche's I think therefore I can take two whole moves inverse rule - made popular by the 1936 bratwurst team. That the next move is: Mornington Crescent. I thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
not a Postman Pat Posted December 8, 2003 Share Posted December 8, 2003 Chris - normally an excellent move . However, Boonie's experience showing through there - well done Boonie Pat and his not quite black and white cat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boonie Hound Posted December 8, 2003 Share Posted December 8, 2003 As McDonalds say - I'm lovin it. An easy start - I think: Covent garden Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisb Posted December 8, 2003 Share Posted December 8, 2003 I think you'll be enjoying this one..... King William Street 😬 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhubarb Posted December 8, 2003 Author Share Posted December 8, 2003 hmmmm Covent Garden. Interesting opening gambit. It is obvious that under the Hammer&Spigot regulations Rev 3, paragraph 6, sub-clause 17 (concise version) I can entendre your Covent and apply the split-infinitive and pass straight to Oxford Circus, passing Jono and the boys on the way... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meldrew Posted December 8, 2003 Share Posted December 8, 2003 As long as we're recognising Schrodinger's clarification, Arnos Grove. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scooby dooby doo Posted December 8, 2003 Share Posted December 8, 2003 I'll emply Smythe-Watkinson's 1894 Bakerloo clarification and move to Green Park. Sorry Meldrew.... HOOPY R706KGU Hoopylight R Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boonie Hound Posted December 8, 2003 Share Posted December 8, 2003 Humph - that nearly had me stumped Belsize Park Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meldrew Posted December 8, 2003 Share Posted December 8, 2003 The Bakerloo correction only applies when the umpire has declared flags, Hoopy. Flags have not been declared and hence that is void (unless you are [bold]then[/bold] going to employ the Martin-Baker offside rule from the 1954 Warrington Convention). However, we'll let you off. Stanwell (sneaky, huh?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
La vache espagnole Posted December 8, 2003 Share Posted December 8, 2003 Aha! I see an opportunity to apply the Gonzales/Watson diversion: Euston Square 😳 nothing... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.Mupferit Posted December 8, 2003 Share Posted December 8, 2003 I've been waiting since my last move on Saturday to see how this fascinating game of intrigue and strategy develops before employing my master stroke which never fails to stump the opposition. Prepare to be amazed................ MOORGATE Brent Zetec Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
La vache espagnole Posted December 8, 2003 Share Posted December 8, 2003 Blast ❗ Gazumped again... 😳 nothing... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meldrew Posted December 8, 2003 Share Posted December 8, 2003 Very good Brent, but you failed to notice that table 4 has been rescinded by the judge....so.........Essex Road! (Playing with fire, I know, but daring moves are always rewarded in my experience). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now