Roger Ford Posted August 7, 2007 Share Posted August 7, 2007 Doesn't really matter how easy it is to enforce. The threat of possible enforcement OR a protest is enough for most competitors to have to toe the line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichardO Posted August 7, 2007 Share Posted August 7, 2007 Speaking with my official hat on, ease of enforcement is very relevant. There are always a few who push the limits - and if it's difficult to detect then they'll try it on for sure. R Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Happy Posted August 7, 2007 Share Posted August 7, 2007 It is posible to have a look alike cat that does not contain at cat at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robmar Posted August 7, 2007 Author Share Posted August 7, 2007 TM - yes very easily I would have thought Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robmar Posted August 7, 2007 Author Share Posted August 7, 2007 Richard - in which case WRT to all race cars does a F1 car manufactured after xyz date have to run a CAT 🤔 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichardO Posted August 7, 2007 Share Posted August 7, 2007 Rob; It would have to be an F1 running out of championship for this to even be relevant of course - current F1 is run to FIA, not MSA, regs. Anyway, the (proposed) rule says "production based" cars, so an F1 car running at an MSA event would be exempt from this rule. It may still be covered by the championship/formula rules under which it was running tho. But the MSA rule goes on to specifically include kit cars, so we would all caught in the net - even class 6. Unless we start running international events under FIA rules that is R Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichardO Posted August 7, 2007 Share Posted August 7, 2007 An interesting thing tho : what is a "production based" car? Only a couple of companies make formula fords, and they make quite a few of them, so would these be covered? Who knows As I said above, not an enforcable rule at present! R Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterg Posted August 7, 2007 Share Posted August 7, 2007 Blimey, I thought you lot all reckoned a Caterham wasn't a kitcar....now you're worried because it is! 😬 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now