Jump to content
Click here to contact our helpful office staff ×

which diff ratio


david nelson

Recommended Posts

  • Area Representative

David,

The theory goes, that a lower diff ratio will give better acceleration, and the maths looks to agree with this.

With a change of ratio from 3.62 to 3.92, The force that appears at the wheels at any given revs in a given gear, will be some 8% better! (but at an 8% lower speed)

However, I changed from a 3.62 to a 3.92 at the beginning of this year, and I'm not so sure its any better!

For example, where at Curborough, I would have stayed in second from "Mole hill" to "Fradley", I now have to take third, and then back down to second, then along the straight, I'm up into fourth before braking for "Flag pole", where previously I would have only got to third. Previously, I would have stayed in second from "Flag pole" to "Mole Hill", but now I need to take third, and back down to second.

I think that what I've gained in acceleration, I've lost again in additional gear changes. I've certainly not approached "Fradley" with the same confidence I had before, knowing that I've got a down change whilst braking heavily that may unsettle the car.

So, I'm still undecided.

May be I just need to try a little harder at Curborough *smile*

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have made the same change as Richard, and it certainly makes a difference, but as to quicker , I think that will depend on the course. If there is a really tight course, and a number of sprint courses have hairpins around a single bollard, then the lower ratio in second gear is a hugh bonus. But as Richard says there is the potential for more grear changes, sometimes, when you really could do with out it. Suppose that would be why race cars/ bikes change ratios to suit the individual track 😬
Link to comment
Share on other sites

you use lower diffs when either the track is very short and twisty or you do not have sufficient power and you need the acceleration - always at the expense of top speed. The gear changes are not usually a problem, unless the track has a combination of twisty bits and long straights, as you just ignore first and possibly second.

I think you need to look at high gears, but you really need to determine if you have a problem first.

 

Antonella *smile*

1998 Caterham Vx 1.6

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

richard

 

were the other conditions close enough to make your times comparable?

i changed my diff. to lower ratios, but also made some other changes so the quicker times may be the result of other factors *confused*

 

david

 

trouble is you can't easily change them to run back-to-back comparisons, but purely for sprint times in UK i think you'd be better off with the lower ratio diff

 

jerry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dave

you should be aiming to carry enough speed aroudn the molehill to stay in 3rd with a 3.92 diff
Is that with a 5spd or 6spd box?

 

I'll give it a go next year - I am still changing down to 2nd just after turning right before molehill (6spd). It would save me a couple of gear changes (i.e. chances to muck it up).

 

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Area Representative
you should be aiming to carry enough speed aroudn the molehill to stay in 3rd with a 3.92 diff ( unless you are on wood tyres)

 

Yes, list 1a wooden tyres!

I remember PowderPuff say "don't brake untill after the kerb on the right hand side before mole hill". That worked well for me untill I managed to carry more speed around "Woodside". I did keep trying to brake that late but kept ending up on the grass! I guess thats why class 3 time are quicker than class 2 times!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

David,

 

IMO a 3.62 diff is too tall for a low powered car with circa 120lb ft torque . A 3.92 will be quicker especially if you are forced to use 21/22" diameter radial tyres. Its no big expense to try a 3.92 and swap back if your not happy. The 3.62 was only really suitable for superlites equipped with 20" Diameter ACB10`s.

 

Rob

 

Edited by - Rob Walker on 9 Dec 2006 20:40:39

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...